UNCLASSIFIED // DEMO // EXERCISE USE ONLY — FICTIONAL SCENARIOS
——————Z
← Portal
⚠ SAMPLE DATA Live feed unreachable — showing a built-in sample so the tribunal still runs. Findings below are illustrative only.
START HERE — PICK A CASE TO PUT ON TRIAL Tap a card and it runs immediately: the platform pulls live open-source coverage, reads every report against each competing explanation, and hands the gavel to you. This is — the CIA's structured technique for keeping analysts honest.
Free-text questions get three generic hypotheses — Deteriorating / Stable / Improving — tried against live coverage.
PULLING OPEN-SOURCE COVERAGE — GDELT DOC 2.0 …
0 of 0 reviewed
The machine's read is a — tap any verdict to override it. Your call is final and goes in the log.
Verdict — least-refuted hypothesismachine counts · human decided every cell
ACH Matrixtap any cell to change the verdict
Ranking rule (ACH doctrine): hypotheses are ranked by fewest inconsistencies — the evidence that survives refutation wins, not the pile of confirmations. Rows flagged DIAGNOSTIC actually discriminate between hypotheses; rows consistent-with-everything prove nothing.
Per-hypothesis decompositionevery count opens to its evidence
Diagnostic evidence spotlightwhat actually discriminates
Sensitivity checklive — recomputed on every change
Session logappend-only
UNCLASSIFIED // DEMO